Dodaj artykuł  


Inne artykuły

Pederasta decyduje o polskiej kulturze? 
27 listopad 2013      Artur Łoboda
Zacieśnienie szeregów postkomuny 
11 maj 2015      Artur Łoboda
Banki na luzie 
13 padziernik 2010      Goska
Skutki "marszu szmat" 
30 listopad 2017     
Z góry skazani na klęskę 
23 listopad 2011      Artur Łoboda
Mord rytualny na polskiej kulturze 
10 lipiec 2014      Artur Łoboda
Duda jak Pinokio i marionetka. Frankowicze protestowali w Warszawie 
28 marzec 2017      Autor: AR
2012 Olimpiada w Londynie 
10 wrzesień 2010      Goska
Kilka uwag w Święto Odzyskania Niepodległości 
11 listopad 2012      Artur Łoboda
Sprawa DSK 
17 maj 2011      Artur Łoboda
Czy jesteś za podarowaniem Putinowi Braci Kaczyńskich? 
17 wrzesień 2009      tłumacz
Oświadczenie w sprawie żądań Ringer Axel Springer Polska wobec wydawcy „Warszawskiej Gazety” 
1 kwiecień 2017      Warszawska Gazeta
Cena wiedzy 
7 maj 2015      Artur Łoboda
Pomnik bieżącej władzy 
11 kwiecień 2016      Artur Łoboda
Tacy lekarze sa dzisiaj wszedzie 
26 padziernik 2010      Goska
Mistyfikacje na temat historii, a współczesność 
3 czerwiec 2013      Artur Łoboda
Jak PO traktuje własny elektorat 
14 maj 2015     
25 czerwiec 2010      Gasienica
Gdyby PiS było tym - za kogo się podaje 
23 maj 2017     
Było tak - jak miało być 
12 listopad 2018      Artur Łoboda


Ahmadinejad bears a message for Israel

By Kaveh L Afrasiabi
Asia Times, Oct 14, 2010

Ahmadinejad called in his conversation with Saudi Arabia's King Abdullah for "closer coordination" between the countries to "create regional stability, especially in Lebanon", according to the Iranian press.

In light of King Abdullah's recent visit to Lebanon, reflecting a more proactive Saudi involvement in Lebanese affairs aimed atsustaining Lebanon's fragile internal peace, such diplomatic gestures by Ahmadinejad build confidence between Tehran and Riyadh as well as with other Arab capitals. This includes Cairo, which has taken a positive step in repairing ties with Iran by setting up an air link with Tehran.

Assuming Ahmadinejad's trip to Lebanon goes as planned and without any major hitches, it could go a long way in improving Iran's relations with the entire Arab world, which is somewhat weary of Tehran's politics of "sphere of influence" in Iraq and Lebanon, among other countries.

Iran's ambassador to Baghdad made it known in a recent meeting with Iraqi leaders that Tehran preferred the premiership of Nuri al-Maliki, a comment vilified in some Arab papers as tantamount to interference in Iraq's internal affairs. Maliki has been struggling since elections in March to form a government that would give him another term in power.

From Tehran's vantage point, the comment was a reminder of Iran's substantial influence in Iraq's dominant pro-Iran Shi'ite coalition - a fait accompli worthy of consideration by those pundits in the West who depict Iran as a "paper tiger". In contrast, some Arab pundits go to the other extreme and portray Iran as a "regional superpower".

The fact is, Iran is neither. It is a regional middle power benefiting from a geostrategic and geo-economic location straddling the two energy hubs of the Persian Gulf and the Caspian Sea, and it was deeply rattled by the post-September 11 infusion of Western power in its vicinity threatening its national securirty.

"The president's intention of the visit to Lebanon is several-fold," said a Tehran University political scientist who specializes in Iran's foreign relations. "First, he wants to make sure that there is no attempt to weaken Hezbollah because of the Hariri investigation." This is a reference to the United Nations-backed international tribunal investigating the assassination of former Lebanese president Rafik Hariri in Beirut in 2005; it is widely expected to implicate Lebanon's Hezbollah.

"Second, he [Ahmadinejad] wants to improve trade and economic ties between Iran and Lebanon. He will travel to south Lebanon to send a message to Israel that they can bet there will be a frontal attack on Israel from south Lebanon if Israel ever dares to attack Iran.

"Third, with Hezbollah's substantial arsenal of missiles, grown several-fold since the 2006 war [with Israel], that is a warning that no Israeli politician can afford to ignore. Fourth, the president is trying to improve relations with the Arab world and Lebanon is the gateway," said the political scientist, who added that the timing "is crucial because of both internal Lebanon politics and the waves of anti-Iran initiatives by the US and its allies. ... This visit is intended to elevate Iran's regional status."

Ahmadinejad is scheduled to meet President Michel Suleiman, Prime Minister Saad Hariri and parliament speaker Nabih Berri. He will also meet Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah.

Given the huge publicity the two-day visit has generated, the stakes appear to be so high that Iran is worried that nervous Americans and Israelis may play mischief and resort to indirect acts of violence in Lebanon to deflect some of the attention from Ahmadinejad.

Israeli media are awash with government warnings to the Lebanese authorities not to allow Ahmadinejad to tour the border between the two countries. Some reports hinted that the president's intention to throw a stone in Israel's direction was designed to escalate tensions with Israel, a tit-for-tat for Israel's alleged complicity in a cyber-attack on Iran's nuclear facilities.

According to another analyst at a Tehran think-tank, Iran has learned a precious lesson from Iraq, which was subjected to years of sanctions prior to the country's invasion in 2003. "Iran will not be another Iraq and Tehran can answer with hard power the sting of soft-power sanctions," the analyst told the author.

The United Nations, and the United States unilaterally, have imposed a raft of sanctions on Iran over its uranium-enrichment program. These are "retarding Iran's economic growth", to paraphrase some Iranian parliamentarians.

However, Tehran is not in a panic just yet, particularly since the recent US announcement of four major oil companies quitting Iran in response to the sanctions appears to have been made prematurely, according to reports from the Iranian Oil Ministry as well as news reports from outside the country. It was reported this month that France's Total, Royal Dutch Shell, Norway's Statoil and Italian Eni had agreed to abandon their business ties with Iran to avoid being hit with US sanctions.

A part of the reason Western oil majors are reluctant to end their involvement in Iran is that their lucrative contracts will most likely be taken over by Chinese companies, especially since the West has little control over China's economic relations with Iran.

Still, the Iranians continue to be worried about the adverse impact of sanctions in future foreign investment in the energy sector, which needs tens of billions of dollars to modernize its facilities. For example, a report states that while Iran's most recent five-year plan had slated some US$200 billion in investment in the oil and gas sector, only $70 billion had been earmarked to date. In other words, it is definitely in Iran's national economic interests to contain the nuclear crisis that is having an adverse economic impact on the overall economy.

Regarding the latter, European Union foreign policy chief Catherine Ashton has expressed optimism on the renewal of nuclear talks "very soon"; this after coming under fire from Iran for "delaying" the dialogue.

Combining the familiar carrot and stick approach, the Europeans seem poised to restart the talks in an environment most conducive to their strategy, which is why coinciding with Ashton's statement British Foreign Secretary William Hague vowed "tougher sanctions". The aim is to garner major concessions from Tehran on the nuclear front.

In this environment, Tehran's response has been to play more overt "sphere-of-influence" politics in the region, one that conveys the impression that the lion (Iran's national symbol) is capable of roaring back if pressed too hard.

Kaveh L Afrasiabi, PhD, is the author of After Khomeini: New Directions in Iran's Foreign Policy (Westview Press) . He is author of Reading In Iran Foreign Policy After September 11 (BookSurge Publishing , October 23, 2008) and his latest book, Looking for rights at Harvard, is now available.
16 padziernik 2010

przysłał ICP 




Zabawne sa te obawy Izraela przed fizycznym zblizeniem sie Ahmadinejada do granicy Izraela. Moglby rzucic kamieniem.

Ciekawe ze biznes naftowy Zachodu wciaz jest obecny z inwestycjami w Iranie, pomimo amerykanskich sankcji. Zachodnioeuropejskie firmy nie sa sklonne porzucic intratne kontrakty w Iranie, gdyz wtedy ich miejsce zajma Chinczycy. Tylko gdzie w tym wszystkim jest miejsce dla Polski i jej interesow?




Widmo Islamizacji Rosji i destabilizacja Bliskiego Wschodu
marzec 6, 2007
Iwo Cyprian Pogonowski
Praca - dobro luksusowe ?
czerwiec 26, 2003
Artur Kowalski
Dziecięcy antysemityzm? – czy kolejna bajka dziennikarzy GW "z tysiąca i jednej nocy”.
maj 26, 2008
Koszmar Więzień w USA
kwiecień 23, 2007
Iwo Cyprian Pogonowski
A w Polsce okradają w majestacie prawa...
czerwiec 27, 2008
Mirosław Naleziński, Gdynia
Hej kto Polak na bagnety
kwiecień 12, 2006
Publikacja wolnej prasy polskiej
70 lat w psychiatryku za kradzież 12,5 pensa
wrzesień 29, 2007
wrzesień 30, 2004
Zmierzch Blaira początkiem końca globalizmu?
maj 13, 2007
G. Cimek
Polscy obywatele "Komisji Trójstronnej"
(Tajna władza Świata)

listopad 19, 2005
Partia Mężczyzn!
grudzień 8, 2006
Adam Wielomski
Gaz ziemny na tle obecnych zagrożeń wojennych
luty 21, 2007
Iwo Cyprian Pogonowski
Emeryt na rencie
marzec 20, 2008
"Z Bogiem na czacie"
marzec 11, 2006
Błędy lekarskie - kosztowne ubezpieczenia szpitali? - koszta społeczne znacznie większe
styczeń 17, 2006
Adam Sandauer
Help those who need help
kwiecień 29, 2003
przesłała Elżbieta
Sojusz Talmudu z Radykalnymi Protestantami
marzec 9, 2008
Iwo Cyprian Pogonowski
Krucjata XXI wieku
grudzień 7, 2003
Mienie żydowskie ?
sierpień 13, 2003
przesłała Elżbieta
czerwiec 11, 2008
Marek Jastrząb


Fundacja Promocji Kultury
Copyright © 2002 - 2012 Polskie Niezależne Media